I’ve recently added a new chapter to my long-running demographics journal, which I will present in more detail later this month. Before I get to that, I thought that I would have a look at my own financial performance in 2021. In preview, I did ok, but not as well as the market. My portfolio, split across two accounts at AJ Bell and Nordea, returned 6.6% in 2021, when adjusted for a significant zero-return cash position, and around 10% on its own. I am embarrassed to say that I dropped the ball on the month-to-date PnL calculations throughout the year to a larger extent than usual, so these numbers are a bit a uncertain. They are, in any case, far from the show-stopping returns of the MSCI World equity, index at just over 21%, let alone the performance of the mighty S&P 500, at 27%. My first two charts plot the top and bottom 10 performers, which is as good a basis as any to talk about markets.
Read MoreIt’s been ages since I checked in on markets, but I am a happy, and a little dismayed, to report that investors and analysts are trampling around in the same weeds. Is inflation transitory or not? Will supply-side disruptions persist? And what about fiscal and monetary policy; will one loosen and the other tighten? In fairness, we have seen a shift in the economic outlook, for the worse. The reopening bump in economic activity, as virus restrictions were eased, is over, leaving economists to ponder what pace of growth to expect as the pandemic-induced macro volatility recedes. This moment was always coming, but almost on cue, we now have to contend with a litany of downside risks in the form of a real-income sapping rise in energy prices and a real estate crunch in China. These headwinds haven’t put much of a dent in risk assets, yet. The MSCI World and S&P 500 are down a paltry 1.5% and 2.5% from their highs at the start of September, respectively, and are still holding on to handsome year–to-date gains, 14.7% and 18.9%, respectively.
Read MoreFirst things first, the bull market and, predominantly retail driven, frenzy in cryptocurrencies, SPACs, NFTs, and BANG stocks—BlackBerry, AMC, Nokia, and GameStop—are to me all derivatives of the fact that the policy mandarins of the world are showering the real economy and financial markets with unprecedented levels of liquidity. To be clear, I do not mean to disparage traders who are able to extract value from these markets; all power to them. What I am saying is that if global monetary policymakers were not doing QE by the trillions, on an annualised basis, the bull market in many of these things would evaporate like mist on a hot summer morning. Meanwhile, in old-school assets—themselves beneficiaries of QE—the overarching theme at the moment seems that the vol-sellers are back in charge. The VIX has hurtled lower, to just over 15, and at this rate it will soon be in the low teens. The same is the case for the MOVE index for fixed income volatility, which is also now clearly driving lower, hitting a 13-month low of 53.4 in May.
Read MoreAs my previous post can attest, my mind has been focused elsewhere in recent weeks—and I am also preparing a my next long-form essay to boot—but I thought that I’d have a peak at markets all the same. The Fed’s (non)decision on yield curve control came and went without any significant shift. The FOMC has now locked down the funds rate until the end of 2022, at least, more or less in line with what markets were already expecting anyway. That said, the shift to “time-contingent” forward guidance—over 30 months no less—is a significant step. It caps a remarkable transition from a Fed on auto-pilot in late 2018—with the 2-year yield aiming for 3%—to one now “not even thinking about thinking about raising rates.” A lot of water has gone under the bridge since then, but it’s difficult to escape the conclusion that the shift in U.S. and global monetary policy over the past 24 months is fundamental. The idea of a central bank put was born a long time ago, but it’s difficult to imagine a version stronger than its current form. Quite simply, policymakers wonʼt tolerate, and canʼt afford, tightening financial conditions, of any kind, and over any time horizon, however short and temporary. I have spent considerable ink on these pages arguing that this makes the rebound in equities, in the face of a crashing economy, more-or-less reasonable. In fact, it’s normal for equities to exhibit their strongest return-profiles early in the rebound, as a positive function of sharply rising excess liquidity as policy shifts, but also simply thanks to a low base. After all, it has to pay for those with the guts to buy at the lows.
Read More