Let’s start with the good news. The panic brought on by the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature, and more recently, the shotgun wedding between UBS and Credit Suisse has not produced a financial crisis, at least not yet. The bad news is that it could be the proverbial straw that breaks the camel’s back for economies in North America and Europe. We’ve now likely reached the point that markets pivot from looking at the monthly CPI numbers to a broader set of data to determine their view of the world. Investors will be spending a lot of time in Q2 perusing data on lending, deposit flows, and credit standards for evidence that turmoil in the banking is driving tighter credit conditions, and slower growth in the economy. This then will also invite investors to look beyond inflation in forming their view on, and expectations for, monetary policy.
Read MoreIt was heartwarming to see equities attempt a rebound from the initial knee-jerk plunge in the wake of yet another consensus-beating U.S. CPI print last week. BofA’s Michael Hartnett called it the ‘bear hug’, noting that the “SPX was up 5% in 5 hours after a hot CPI because it was simply so oversold”. By the close on Friday, however, the hug had turned into a strangulation. The S&P 500 fell 2.4% on the day, finishing the week with a 1.8% loss. It is difficult to see anything but pain in equities as long as the triumvirate of doom—DM core inflation, bond yields and fixed income volatility—are making new highs. My next three charts show that they are doing exactly that. Barring an outlier in the UK September print, my gauge of OECD core inflation rose further at the end of Q3, bond yields are at new highs, and so is the MOVE index.
Read MoreThere are a lot of things we don’t know about Russia’s attempt to invade Ukraine, but there are also some things we do know. Mr. Putin’s gamble, and the West’s response, has brought into view one of the few existential tail risks that isn’t a Black Swan, which is to say, it is a known unknown: The risk of an escalation into war between Russia and NATO, and the exchange of nuclear weaponry. The continued call on NATO from Ukraine president Volodymyr Zelensky to impose a no-fly zone his country is an alarming case in point. I have no idea how to quantify such a risk, and it is fair to assume that markets don’t either, at least not with any accuracy. BCA’s suggestion that you might as well be long stocks on a 12-month basis, even if you think an ICBM is headed your way is probably a fair reflection of the level of analysis you can expect from your favourite sell-side researcher. Take everything you read with a heap of salt.
Read MoreFinancial markets have a tendency to gravitate towards the same narratives over and over, a bit like a good script writer who knows, obviously, that the hero always has to save the cat in the first scene. Core and headline Inflation have soared, and the Fed, as the perennial first mover among the major central banks—curiously flanked by its trusty squire the BOE—is now determined to kill it with rate hikes and QT, having recently abandoned all hope it being ‘transitory’. Cue new scene, and we are witnessing a torrent of forecasters tripping over each other to proclaim that they now think the federales will lift the Fed funds rate by five, six, or even seven, times this year, not to mention shrink its balance sheet by $1T. Markets have been blissfully ignoring the threat of monetary policy tightening, until now. As I type global equities are down 5-to-10% month-to-date in January, and the yield curve is flatter. What comes next?
Read More