fixed income — Alpha.Sources

In the Pipe, Five-by-Five

I recently said that markets were cruising for a bruising. For now, they’re just cruising, mirroring the path set by Corporal Ferro as she guides her drop ship to a perfect landing on LV-426 in James Cameron’s Aliens.

There is still little stopping risk assets, short vol is paying steady premiums for those picking up dimes in front of the proverbial steamroller, and risk-free instruments still offer 4-to-5% for anyone who feels like temporarily getting off the train. In other words, it’s very pleasant indeed for investors. From the perspective of the macro data, that’s easy to explain. Markets are still being fed information that the (global) economy is doing ok, inflation is falling and while interest rates are set to stay high, they’re also about to come down, by 50-to-100bp. Does this story still check out? Just about.

A change in focus?

Let’s start with the good news. The panic brought on by the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature, and more recently, the shotgun wedding between UBS and Credit Suisse has not produced a financial crisis, at least not yet. The bad news is that it could be the proverbial straw that breaks the camel’s back for economies in North America and Europe. We’ve now likely reached the point that markets pivot from looking at the monthly CPI numbers to a broader set of data to determine their view of the world. Investors will be spending a lot of time in Q2 perusing data on lending, deposit flows, and credit standards for evidence that turmoil in the banking is driving tighter credit conditions, and slower growth in the economy. This then will also invite investors to look beyond inflation in forming their view on, and expectations for, monetary policy.

Markets and Tradingclaus vistesenApril 2, 2023bonds, fixed income, MOVE, equities, growth, banks, volatility, inflation, CPI, core inflation

A broken record

First things first, I am GBP-based investor, which means that I need to think about both the value of currency and asset, when I dip my toe into US financial markets. With GBPUSD pushing 1.40 and the US 10y motoring bast 1.5%, I had to do something last week, and that something was to buy some duration in the US. I thought that I’d put that up front, because in what follows, I will sound like a broken record It is now getting feisty in bond-land. The sell-off in US duration got rowdy last week, and is now starting to pull up bond yields in Europe. What’s more, front-end curves are steepening too, which is to say that markets are now trying to bring forward rate hike expectations into market-relevant forecast horizons. As I have explained on these pages since the beginning of the year, investors and strategists are still debating whether this is all part of the plan—reflecting a desired increase in growth and inflation expectations—or whether it constitutes an undue tightening in financial conditions. Market observers remain undecided, partly because policymakers can’t seem to figure out where to draw the line either. Higher bond yields are good, so long as they don’t become a constraint on the recovery via a tightening of financial conditions. In principle, there is nothing wrong with this position, though it also invites the situation we now find ourselves in. Put simply, yields will motor higher until something breaks, or until policymakers call it quits.

Control This

My pre-holiday missive that FX volatility is making a comeback. Mr. Trump’s threat to slam tariffs on Chinese consumer goods earlier this month prompted the PBoC to step back and “allow” USDCNY to breach 7.0. This, in turn, drove the U.S. to label China as a currency manipulator. Markets now have to consider that the trade war are morphing into currency wars. This is significant for two reasons. First, it confirms what most punters already knew; the CNY is inclined to go lower if left alone by the PBoC. Secondly, it has brought us one step closer to the revelation of how far Mr. Trump is willing to go. The problem for the U.S. president is simple. He can bully his main trading partners with tariffs, “winning” the trade wars, but he is losing the currency wars in so far as goes as his desire for a weaker dollar. The veiled threat to print dollars and buy RMB assets, as part of the move to identify China as a manipulator, is a loose threat. Just to make it clear; it would involve the Fed printing dollars and buying Chinese government debt and/or stakes in SOEs, which would probably be politically contentious. Moreover, the PBoC could respond in kind; in fact, it probably would.

02

Alpha Sources Blog