Last week we learned that China’s population shrunk last year, for the first time in 60 years, by 850K, the net result of 9.6M live births, and 10.4M deaths. It is worth taking these numbers with a pinch of salt. Accurately accounting for some 1.4B people is difficult, especially down to a sub-1M difference between deaths and births. It’s possible that future revisions will show that China’s population has been shrinking since the beginning of the 2020s, or that it won’t start shrinking until 2025 or beyond. What is clear for anyone with even cursory knowledge of Chinese demographics, however, is that this headline was coming sooner rather than later. China’s fertility rate has long since declined below the replacement level, and all-age mortality is now rising as the population ages. But does it matter that China’s population is now shrinking?
Read MoreIt was heartwarming to see equities attempt a rebound from the initial knee-jerk plunge in the wake of yet another consensus-beating U.S. CPI print last week. BofA’s Michael Hartnett called it the ‘bear hug’, noting that the “SPX was up 5% in 5 hours after a hot CPI because it was simply so oversold”. By the close on Friday, however, the hug had turned into a strangulation. The S&P 500 fell 2.4% on the day, finishing the week with a 1.8% loss. It is difficult to see anything but pain in equities as long as the triumvirate of doom—DM core inflation, bond yields and fixed income volatility—are making new highs. My next three charts show that they are doing exactly that. Barring an outlier in the UK September print, my gauge of OECD core inflation rose further at the end of Q3, bond yields are at new highs, and so is the MOVE index.
Read MoreIt's little over a year ago that that I almost choked on my coffee when I read in the FT that Blackrock, one of the world’s largest asset managers, was recommending investors to increase their allocation to Chinese equities and bonds. This wasn’t because I thought this was a bad investment, per se, The comment by Wei Li, chief investment strategist at Blackrock, that Chinese assets are under-represented in portfolios given the relative size of China’s financial market is probably true. More interestingly, in a world where (some) economists are worried about the imbalanced trade relationship between the US and China—due mainly to subdued Chinese domestic demand and excessive savings—a reversal in capital flows between the world’s major economies is exactly what the doctor ordered. This is especially the case if, as is customarily hoped, it coincides with a liberalisation of and the opening of China’s capital account, and more freely floating CNY.
Read MoreIt's difficult to think of a more politically incorrect idea than recommending investors to allocate money to China's government bond market, ostensibly by selling a portion of their U.S. treasuries. Granted, this would actually be consistent with the rebalancing of the bilateral U.S.-Sino trade relationship that the most ardent critiques of China's economic model desperately want. Or perhaps what they really want is a strong dollar plus capital controls? It is difficult to tell sometimes. That said, it is fair to say that lending money to China's government to fund domestic investment, some of which invariably will go to defence, probably doesn't get you on the White House's Christmas list. Incidentally, and before I flesh out the trade, I should make one thing clear. I think the mismatch between the increasingly tense geopolitical relationship between China and the U.S., and the fact that capital and goods still flow more or less freely—with the exception of direct outflows from China's mainland—between them represent an enormous tail risk for markets.
Read More